<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I thought we&#8217;d hear shrieking!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/</link>
	<description>Stuff in Baldy's SmugMug life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:46:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff W</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-16214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-16214</guid>
		<description>The homepage has changed by now, so nothing to discuss there... 

On black backgrounds, I&#039;ve typically hated them on websites, ... BUT... I&#039;ve found that I really like them for photos.  They help frame photos and make the colors stand out, drawing attention to the photo more than white seem to (IMO).

So, I know I can change to other themes, but so far my 2 SM sites both stick with the black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The homepage has changed by now, so nothing to discuss there&#8230; </p>
<p>On black backgrounds, I&#8217;ve typically hated them on websites, &#8230; BUT&#8230; I&#8217;ve found that I really like them for photos.  They help frame photos and make the colors stand out, drawing attention to the photo more than white seem to (IMO).</p>
<p>So, I know I can change to other themes, but so far my 2 SM sites both stick with the black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Mac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 15:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Sorry to weigh in on this so late. I just subscribed to SmugMug last month, NOT because of the look of the site (It just might have scared me away!), but because I was disappointed in Flickr and did more research that I should have done in the first place.

Colors don&#039;t bother me much, but I really have mixed feelings on the black page background. Makes reading text more difficult - no doubt about that. But black does show the photos much better. There is probably a way to have just the photos on a black background and have most of the text on a lighter background, though I&#039;m not certain how to accomplish that.

Either way, it didn&#039;t draw me to look harder and subscribe, but then again it also didn&#039;t stop me from subscribing. As long as your &quot;word of mouth&quot; reputation is pristine - as it is - your colors won&#039;t hurt you much. Though a nicer looking home page and general site theme and logo might draw a little more traffic.

Thanks for asking!

J-Mac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to weigh in on this so late. I just subscribed to SmugMug last month, NOT because of the look of the site (It just might have scared me away!), but because I was disappointed in Flickr and did more research that I should have done in the first place.</p>
<p>Colors don&#8217;t bother me much, but I really have mixed feelings on the black page background. Makes reading text more difficult &#8211; no doubt about that. But black does show the photos much better. There is probably a way to have just the photos on a black background and have most of the text on a lighter background, though I&#8217;m not certain how to accomplish that.</p>
<p>Either way, it didn&#8217;t draw me to look harder and subscribe, but then again it also didn&#8217;t stop me from subscribing. As long as your &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; reputation is pristine &#8211; as it is &#8211; your colors won&#8217;t hurt you much. Though a nicer looking home page and general site theme and logo might draw a little more traffic.</p>
<p>Thanks for asking!</p>
<p>J-Mac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spb.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Spb.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 09:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>B&amp;W design .... Its Coooool! =) Speshial for Monochrome Monitors =)))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B&amp;W design &#8230;. Its Coooool! =) Speshial for Monochrome Monitors =)))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrc.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 08:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>&gt; .... The white text on black background makes it much harder for many people to read. 

I Agree ... =(((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8230;. The white text on black background makes it much harder for many people to read. </p>
<p>I Agree &#8230; =(((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mesothelioma</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>mesothelioma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Anonymous Says: 

November 27th, 2005 at 4:56 pm 
I think the black background is beautiful, and makes photos shine individually. Plus, it makes you guys unique from the rest, I say keep it for sure. ----&gt;
Very Pragmatic! completely her(its) support</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous Says: </p>
<p>November 27th, 2005 at 4:56 pm<br />
I think the black background is beautiful, and makes photos shine individually. Plus, it makes you guys unique from the rest, I say keep it for sure. &#8212;-&gt;<br />
Very Pragmatic! completely her(its) support</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I think the black background is beautiful, and makes photos shine individually. Plus, it makes you guys unique from the rest, I say keep it for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the black background is beautiful, and makes photos shine individually. Plus, it makes you guys unique from the rest, I say keep it for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 02:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Re-test.

Reading the opinions in the other posts I wonder what some open sourced designs would like...?  

BTW the tag line is very sensationally transferrable!

Good for smugmug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-test.</p>
<p>Reading the opinions in the other posts I wonder what some open sourced designs would like&#8230;?  </p>
<p>BTW the tag line is very sensationally transferrable!</p>
<p>Good for smugmug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 23:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>And the conversion rate is...  (drum roll...  I knew I&#039;d be able to announce good news, that it was better than before...)

Unchanged.

It seems to have gone from a, &quot;Eh.  A home page.&quot; experience to a love-it hate-it experience with no net gain or loss.

Another interpretation could be that the home page isn&#039;t the key to conversions, the pages with more info are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the conversion rate is&#8230;  (drum roll&#8230;  I knew I&#8217;d be able to announce good news, that it was better than before&#8230;)</p>
<p>Unchanged.</p>
<p>It seems to have gone from a, &#8220;Eh.  A home page.&#8221; experience to a love-it hate-it experience with no net gain or loss.</p>
<p>Another interpretation could be that the home page isn&#8217;t the key to conversions, the pages with more info are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris P</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m color blind, and thought the new homepage looked ok.  Not a strong endorsement, but there are probably 5-10% of your customers who are like me.  Just curious -- what&#039;s your click-through data telling you about the change?

In general, I like the black-backgrounds and agree that they make the site look more professional and help the photos &quot;pop&quot; off the page.  

The logo and name aren&#039;t perfect, but you&#039;ve got some brand equity and name recognition with your customers already, so switching them both probably wouldn&#039;t make sense.  Evolving the logo is the easier of the two, and should probably happen with continued evolution of the look of the site.  

Keep up the good work -- it&#039;s a fantastic service!

Just my $0.02.
Chris P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m color blind, and thought the new homepage looked ok.  Not a strong endorsement, but there are probably 5-10% of your customers who are like me.  Just curious &#8212; what&#8217;s your click-through data telling you about the change?</p>
<p>In general, I like the black-backgrounds and agree that they make the site look more professional and help the photos &#8220;pop&#8221; off the page.  </p>
<p>The logo and name aren&#8217;t perfect, but you&#8217;ve got some brand equity and name recognition with your customers already, so switching them both probably wouldn&#8217;t make sense.  Evolving the logo is the easier of the two, and should probably happen with continued evolution of the look of the site.  </p>
<p>Keep up the good work &#8212; it&#8217;s a fantastic service!</p>
<p>Just my $0.02.<br />
Chris P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>jd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/baldy/2005/07/10/i-thought-wed-hear-shrieking/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>The white text on black background makes it much harder for many people to read.  If you&#039;d like to compare this with black text on a white background, you can use the &quot;Zap Colors&quot; bookmarklet that&#039;s found here: http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/zap.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The white text on black background makes it much harder for many people to read.  If you&#8217;d like to compare this with black text on a white background, you can use the &#8220;Zap Colors&#8221; bookmarklet that&#8217;s found here: <a href="http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/zap.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/zap.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
