<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome, Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2006/06/14/welcome-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2006/06/14/welcome-google/</link>
	<description>Thought stream from SmugMug's CEO &#38; Chief Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:26:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Jordan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2006/06/14/welcome-google/comment-page-1/#comment-104163</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2006/06/14/welcome-google/#comment-104163</guid>
		<description>Safari users can view photos on Google&#039;s Picasaweb, but not on Smugmug.  Firefox usually works, but not always.  Love the Smugmug features, but if my friends can&#039;t view my photos there&#039;s really no point in continuing down the SM path. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari users can view photos on Google&#039;s Picasaweb, but not on Smugmug.  Firefox usually works, but not always.  Love the Smugmug features, but if my friends can&#039;t view my photos there&#039;s really no point in continuing down the SM path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinz Eriksson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2006/06/14/welcome-google/comment-page-1/#comment-6880</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinz Eriksson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2006/06/14/welcome-google/#comment-6880</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the above. I have Smugmug and Picasaweb.
I would easily be prepared to pay the double of Smugmug price to get:
The simplicity , basicness , navigation speed of Picasaweb and unlimited
storage of Smugmug. The open API so that I can do my own scripting
to Smugmug is very useful to me but probably not directly to the average
user. (sm_tool.py python which enable me to mirror two Picasa 
album sets on one Smugmug account automatically).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the above. I have Smugmug and Picasaweb.<br />
I would easily be prepared to pay the double of Smugmug price to get:<br />
The simplicity , basicness , navigation speed of Picasaweb and unlimited<br />
storage of Smugmug. The open API so that I can do my own scripting<br />
to Smugmug is very useful to me but probably not directly to the average<br />
user. (sm_tool.py python which enable me to mirror two Picasa<br />
album sets on one Smugmug account automatically).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtbikejunkie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2006/06/14/welcome-google/comment-page-1/#comment-6071</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtbikejunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2006/06/14/welcome-google/#comment-6071</guid>
		<description>my thoughts are that the google web albums provide a simple and smooth interface that is more intuitive than smugmug. I love smugmug for it&#039;s rich feature set and not going anywhere. I think is what smugmug needs is a &quot;simple&quot; mode that is completely uncluttered with super fast image presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my thoughts are that the google web albums provide a simple and smooth interface that is more intuitive than smugmug. I love smugmug for it&#8217;s rich feature set and not going anywhere. I think is what smugmug needs is a &#8220;simple&#8221; mode that is completely uncluttered with super fast image presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Mac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2006/06/14/welcome-google/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2006/06/14/welcome-google/#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>I installed this beta initially but ended up uninstalling it shortly thereafter. This release is a Roxio Easy Media Creator 8 killer - at least the Drag-to-Disc feature of that version of Roxio is ruined after installing this Picasa beta. I wrote Google and while at first they disavowed any knowledge of this, they subsequently notified me that yes, the DVD burning feature of this beta version conflicts badly with and effectively disables some features of Roxio EMC8. Not a good thing! Especially since they (Google) have not acknowledged this publicly, and users downloading it still will not know about the conflict until they install it and then try to run Roxio EMC8. Google seems to feel that their users are more interested in the ability to burn DVD&#039;s with Picasa 2.5 than using Roxio EMC8.

Well, that&#039;s not good enough for me - I&#039;ve uninstalled it completely - though that did not return Roxio EMC8 to a working status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed this beta initially but ended up uninstalling it shortly thereafter. This release is a Roxio Easy Media Creator 8 killer &#8211; at least the Drag-to-Disc feature of that version of Roxio is ruined after installing this Picasa beta. I wrote Google and while at first they disavowed any knowledge of this, they subsequently notified me that yes, the DVD burning feature of this beta version conflicts badly with and effectively disables some features of Roxio EMC8. Not a good thing! Especially since they (Google) have not acknowledged this publicly, and users downloading it still will not know about the conflict until they install it and then try to run Roxio EMC8. Google seems to feel that their users are more interested in the ability to burn DVD&#8217;s with Picasa 2.5 than using Roxio EMC8.</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s not good enough for me &#8211; I&#8217;ve uninstalled it completely &#8211; though that did not return Roxio EMC8 to a working status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tribeless</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2006/06/14/welcome-google/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>tribeless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2006/06/14/welcome-google/#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s the deal with flock?  Is there any value there for sumgmug users?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s the deal with flock?  Is there any value there for sumgmug users?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.109 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
