Comments on: Amazon S3 = The Holy Grail

By: Free S3 Analytics

Free S3 Analytics — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 07:48:18 +0000

I strongly think that every new company needs to create a new account in amazon s3
and start using it now without spending 10K on storage.

Amazon S3 is real bless for many companies.

By: SmugMug - Photo Sharing Site « Rudimentary Art of Programming & Development

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:07:38 +0000

[...] uses Amazon Web Services(S3 and EC2) and very happy with [...]

By: Amazon AWS at TNC :: Inside Out

Amazon AWS at TNC :: Inside Out — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:33:30 +0000

[...] your system relies on AWS, always have a backup solution in place so that you can keep your basic service [...]

By: links for 2008-02-06 oggin.net

links for 2008-02-06 oggin.net — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:26:44 +0000

[...] SmugBlog: Don MacAskill » Blog Archive » Amazon S3 = The Holy Grail But Amazon’s S3 takes our storage architecture to the next level: Your priceless photos are stored in multiple datacenters, in multiple states, and at multiple companies. They’re orders of magnitude more safe and secure. (tags: Backup Business MySQL hosting server Startup) [...]

By: Don MacAskill

Don MacAskill — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:25:04 +0000

@JoeJoe: I have *lots* of S3 details up. Just search for Amazon S3 on the sidebar.

By: JoeJoe

JoeJoe — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:22:12 +0000

I think it’s lame that the details were taken out. This article is fluff. One rule about blogs is LISTEN to your readers. Almost every posting here is requesting the information. yet no report?

By: Amazon Web Services - the backbone of your new startup? « Justin Rudd’s Drivel

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:42:03 +0000

[...] One of the poster children of AWS is SmugMug. Don MacAskill is one of my favorite writers. He has a post “Amazon S3 = The Holy Grail“. At the very end is this little nugget of information - In response to a comment below, I don’t feel like we “bet the company” on S3 - every photo our customers entrust us with, we keep local copies in our existing distributed storage infrastructure. We use S3 as redundant secondary storage for use in cases of outages, data loss, or other catastrophe. [...]

By: Geek Synapse » Blog Archives » Amazon Web Services: EC2

Geek Synapse » Blog Archives » Amazon Web Services: EC2 — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:40:37 +0000

[...] Uau, mas dinero… De hecho, 500GB de transferencia es mucho si no estas planeando hostear fotos de gran resolución y vídeos. Como prueba, codinghorror (un blog de desarrolladores que es normalmente enlazado por slashdot/digg) llego a un pico de 9GB en uno de sus posts más memorables. Si eres capaz de usar 500GB de transferencia, yo creo que puedes conseguir el dinero del ancho de banda extra fácilmente con adsense u otra herramienta de publicidad. Yo diría que el el ancho de banda S3 se paga por si mismo (otra vez, si no estas moviendo un clon de flickr/youtube). ¿Quién sabe? A lo mejor Amazon empezó con EC2 cuando se dieron cuenta de toda la gente que movía su contenido pesado a S3. [...]

By: Geek Synapse » Blog Archives » Amazon Web Services: EC2

Geek Synapse » Blog Archives » Amazon Web Services: EC2 — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:27:38 +0000

[...] Wow, more money… Actually, 500GB of data transfer is a lot if you’re not planning to host big pictures and videos. As a proof, codinghorror (a developer blog that is usually slashdotted/digged) peaked 9GB in one day of his most memorable posts. If you’re able to use 500GB of data transfer, I think you can get the extra bandwidth money easily with adsense or another advertisement tool. I would say that the S3 bandwidth can be paid by itself (again, if you’re not running a flickr/youtube clone). Who knows? Maybe Amazon just started EC2 when they realized about all that people moving his heavy content to S3. [...]

By: side effects for tri levlen

side effects for tri levlen — Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:30:09 +0000

side effects for tri levlen

news