<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is your Mac on drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/</link>
	<description>Thought stream from SmugMug's CEO &#38; Chief Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:26:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ismail yk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104743</link>
		<dc:creator>ismail yk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104743</guid>
		<description>Thank you very good information.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very good information..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dodd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104389</link>
		<dc:creator>dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104389</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I&#039;ve standardized my pc and mac all on 1.8 on warm white (or page white). I&#039;ve always had to use Adobe gamma to fix the broken default gamma on my pc. This always looked &quot;wonky on PC&#039;s&quot; other than my own. Go figure. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#039;ve standardized my pc and mac all on 1.8 on warm white (or page white). I&#039;ve always had to use Adobe gamma to fix the broken default gamma on my pc. This always looked &quot;wonky on PC&#039;s&quot; other than my own. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren&#233; Damkot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren&#233; Damkot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104344</guid>
		<description>So many misinformation here it&#039;s making my head spin... 
 
Safari displays images with embedded .icc profile correct. 
 
Any Mac user should be using Gamma 2.2, ideally on a calibrated screen. No reason whatsoever to use 1.8. Images will look identical if viewed color managed anyhow. 
 
If you want an image and a background to match in any browser, strip the .icc profile. Easy. 
 
FF 3.0 with color management enabled color manages like Safari should. 
FF 3.5 does it the Safari way by default, but can be set to fully color manage. 
 
@Paul: Calibrate the screen. sRGB is *not* a display profile, and should *not* be used as one. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many misinformation here it&#039;s making my head spin&#8230; </p>
<p>Safari displays images with embedded .icc profile correct. </p>
<p>Any Mac user should be using Gamma 2.2, ideally on a calibrated screen. No reason whatsoever to use 1.8. Images will look identical if viewed color managed anyhow. </p>
<p>If you want an image and a background to match in any browser, strip the .icc profile. Easy. </p>
<p>FF 3.0 with color management enabled color manages like Safari should.<br />
FF 3.5 does it the Safari way by default, but can be set to fully color manage. </p>
<p>@Paul: Calibrate the screen. sRGB is *not* a display profile, and should *not* be used as one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104330</link>
		<dc:creator>paul55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104330</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on a macbook pro, with OS X 10.5.7. 
 
When i calibrate my display to have a gamma 2.2 and whitepoint d65, the display looks different than the profile that I downloaded from the link in this article.  Those 2 calibrations look quite different, with the downloaded one being much more bluish. 
 
I&#039;m using the calibrations to edit in aperture for photos to be used on the web.  Which of those 2 calibrations will give me the closest approximation of what the viewers with a PC will see? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m on a macbook pro, with OS X 10.5.7. </p>
<p>When i calibrate my display to have a gamma 2.2 and whitepoint d65, the display looks different than the profile that I downloaded from the link in this article.  Those 2 calibrations look quite different, with the downloaded one being much more bluish. </p>
<p>I&#039;m using the calibrations to edit in aperture for photos to be used on the web.  Which of those 2 calibrations will give me the closest approximation of what the viewers with a PC will see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASDFFDSFDS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104310</link>
		<dc:creator>ASDFFDSFDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104310</guid>
		<description>2.2 looks so shit though, colours lose all subtlety, 2.2 is a punch in the face, and 1.8 is a gentle caress  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.2 looks so shit though, colours lose all subtlety, 2.2 is a punch in the face, and 1.8 is a gentle caress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jetrel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-104244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104244</guid>
		<description>Oops, almost forgot: 
- crappy proprietary OS underpinnings -&gt; UNIX. 
 
Now if only MS would do that, too. :P </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, almost forgot:<br />
- crappy proprietary OS underpinnings -&gt; UNIX. </p>
<p>Now if only MS would do that, too. <img src='http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jetrel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-104243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jetrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104243</guid>
		<description>Problem solved - apple is moving to 2.2 default gamma in OS X 10.6 &quot;Snow Leopard&quot;. 
 
I have to hand it to steve jobs for being willing to axe many instances of &quot;being different for no good reason&quot;.  The list includes: 
- QuickDraw 3D -&gt; OpenGL 
- SCSI, ADB, and various &#039;mac&#039; cords -&gt; USB 
- PICT images as the OS default -&gt; TIFF, PNG, PDF 
- text in a resource fork -&gt; .TXT files 
- .sit, .hqx, etc -&gt; .zip 
- PPC -&gt; x86 
- ??? -&gt; MP3, MP4 
 
Being different isn&#039;t worth it when it has no advantages. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem solved &#8211; apple is moving to 2.2 default gamma in OS X 10.6 &quot;Snow Leopard&quot;. </p>
<p>I have to hand it to steve jobs for being willing to axe many instances of &quot;being different for no good reason&quot;.  The list includes:<br />
- QuickDraw 3D -&gt; OpenGL<br />
- SCSI, ADB, and various &#039;mac&#039; cords -&gt; USB<br />
- PICT images as the OS default -&gt; TIFF, PNG, PDF<br />
- text in a resource fork -&gt; .TXT files<br />
- .sit, .hqx, etc -&gt; .zip<br />
- PPC -&gt; x86<br />
- ??? -&gt; MP3, MP4 </p>
<p>Being different isn&#039;t worth it when it has no advantages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104066</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104066</guid>
		<description>Эээ, объясните, плиз, а то я чего то не совсем в тему въехал, это как?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Эээ, объясните, плиз, а то я чего то не совсем в тему въехал, это как?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q kleurenprofielen ps cs4 en mac... - 9lives</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104025</link>
		<dc:creator>Q kleurenprofielen ps cs4 en mac... - 9lives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104025</guid>
		<description>[...] anwer: SmugBlog: Don MacAskill Blog Archive This is your Mac on drugs  merci zerograv. weet wel nog ni just watk nu moet doen     __________________ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anwer: SmugBlog: Don MacAskill Blog Archive This is your Mac on drugs  merci zerograv. weet wel nog ni just watk nu moet doen     __________________ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Community De grote Off Topic-thread &#62;&#62;&#62; irc: #9lives.mac &#60;&#60;&#60; - Pagina 101 - 9lives</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/comment-page-4/#comment-104024</link>
		<dc:creator>Community De grote Off Topic-thread &#62;&#62;&#62; irc: #9lives.mac &#60;&#60;&#60; - Pagina 101 - 9lives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/onethumb/2007/02/14/this-is-your-mac-on-drugs/#comment-104024</guid>
		<description>[...] Dresse, &#039;k post nooit op GAD, dus ge moet het hier maar lezen: SmugBlog: Don MacAskill Blog Archive This is your Mac on drugs    __________________ Don&#039;t be too insulted, I probably have a point. Taste, this time it&#039;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dresse, &#8216;k post nooit op GAD, dus ge moet het hier maar lezen: SmugBlog: Don MacAskill Blog Archive This is your Mac on drugs    __________________ Don&#8217;t be too insulted, I probably have a point. Taste, this time it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
