<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally!  Flash supports H.264 video!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/</link>
	<description>Thought stream from SmugMug's CEO &#38; Chief Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:26:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sandeep verma</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-104261</link>
		<dc:creator>sandeep verma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-104261</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys that was extremely helpful!  
 
sandeep verma 
(&lt;a href=&quot;http://sandeepverma.wordpress.com)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://sandeepverma.wordpress.com)&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys that was extremely helpful!  </p>
<p>sandeep verma<br />
(<a href="http://sandeepverma.wordpress.com)" target="_blank">http://sandeepverma.wordpress.com)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://ecshopq.com/&#187; Blog Archive &#187; DivX Looks Outside The Codec For The Future Of Web Video</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-103419</link>
		<dc:creator>http://ecshopq.com/&#187; Blog Archive &#187; DivX Looks Outside The Codec For The Future Of Web Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-103419</guid>
		<description>[...] extra restrictions increase the appeal of Silverlight for DRM hungry Hollywood studios, but it also frustrates their customers in the process. Incompatible file formats are the reason why services like Netflix&#8217;s Watch Now doesn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] extra restrictions increase the appeal of Silverlight for DRM hungry Hollywood studios, but it also frustrates their customers in the process. Incompatible file formats are the reason why services like Netflix&#8217;s Watch Now doesn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Definition Video Sharing: Con Flash E H264 I Video HD Sono Una Realtà &#124; Digg-it.info</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-103301</link>
		<dc:creator>High Definition Video Sharing: Con Flash E H264 I Video HD Sono Una Realtà &#124; Digg-it.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-103301</guid>
		<description>[...] Qui trovi maggiori informazioni sul nuovo servizio di video sharing in HD della Smugmug. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Qui trovi maggiori informazioni sul nuovo servizio di video sharing in HD della Smugmug. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DivX Looks Outside The Codec For The Future Of Web Video</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-102905</link>
		<dc:creator>DivX Looks Outside The Codec For The Future Of Web Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-102905</guid>
		<description>[...] extra restrictions increase the appeal of Silverlight for DRM hungry Hollywood studios, but it also frustrates their customers in the process. Incompatible file formats are the reason why services like Netflix’s Watch Now doesn’t get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] extra restrictions increase the appeal of Silverlight for DRM hungry Hollywood studios, but it also frustrates their customers in the process. Incompatible file formats are the reason why services like Netflix’s Watch Now doesn’t get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmugBlog: Don MacAskill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I demand video to be awesome.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-102688</link>
		<dc:creator>SmugBlog: Don MacAskill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I demand video to be awesome.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-102688</guid>
		<description>[...] The state of video codecs online has been a mess and there&#8217;s been no clear choice, making it very difficult to do awesome video sharing. Luckily, all of that changed when Adobe finally added H.264 support to Flash. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The state of video codecs online has been a mess and there&#8217;s been no clear choice, making it very difficult to do awesome video sharing. Luckily, all of that changed when Adobe finally added H.264 support to Flash. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-69897</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-69897</guid>
		<description>Don -- Could you please comment on Darryl&#039;s response above? As you know, Apple&#039;s saying that folks would rather post video online than burn DVDs. I agree with that.

I create slideshows using Keynote and Photo to Movie. I would like to acquire a SmugMug Pro account for clients to view these online. Is SmugMug headed in this direction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don &#8212; Could you please comment on Darryl&#8217;s response above? As you know, Apple&#8217;s saying that folks would rather post video online than burn DVDs. I agree with that.</p>
<p>I create slideshows using Keynote and Photo to Movie. I would like to acquire a SmugMug Pro account for clients to view these online. Is SmugMug headed in this direction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-68504</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-68504</guid>
		<description>So ahm, I guess this is maybe a hint that SmugMug may some day offer Flash video in H.264 format?

Hooray?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So ahm, I guess this is maybe a hint that SmugMug may some day offer Flash video in H.264 format?</p>
<p>Hooray?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-63710</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-63710</guid>
		<description>Don, I&#039;m not sure why there aren&#039;t any open source encoders for VC-1. I&#039;m guessing there will be soon. VC-1 is a SMPTE standard so people are just as free to develop an open source version of VC-1 as they are for H.264.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, I&#8217;m not sure why there aren&#8217;t any open source encoders for VC-1. I&#8217;m guessing there will be soon. VC-1 is a SMPTE standard so people are just as free to develop an open source version of VC-1 as they are for H.264.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don MacAskill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-63638</link>
		<dc:creator>Don MacAskill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-63638</guid>
		<description>@Tom:

Point me to a free, open-source VC-1 encoder, and I&#039;ll believe that.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom:</p>
<p>Point me to a free, open-source VC-1 encoder, and I&#8217;ll believe that.  <img src='http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/comment-page-1/#comment-63624</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/21/finally-flash-supports-h264-video/#comment-63624</guid>
		<description>Given that MS makes a competing codec (Windows Media/VC-1) and MS is MS, why would you expect them to support H.264?

Even if you&#039;re not willing to take the legal risk with ffmpeg, at least there are H.264 encoders from many vendors available at many different price, performance, and feature levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that MS makes a competing codec (Windows Media/VC-1) and MS is MS, why would you expect them to support H.264?</p>
<p>Even if you&#8217;re not willing to take the legal risk with ffmpeg, at least there are H.264 encoders from many vendors available at many different price, performance, and feature levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
