<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SmugMug supports XFN &amp; FOAF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/</link>
	<description>Thought stream from SmugMug's CEO &#38; Chief Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:26:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brickley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/comment-page-1/#comment-101946</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-101946</guid>
		<description>Hey, this is cool :) Sorry, only just noticed it.

And now I feel bad! I was grumbling about SmugMug (and MySpace) in my blog, ... the story about private photos being brute-force discoverable... but I should&#039;ve asked your side of the story first. So my apologies there. Maybe we just disagree about whether predictable &#039;private&#039; URLs are a problem; but I should&#039;ve asked before grumbling in public.

Re FOAF, XFN etc., do you have any plan to allow users to tag &quot;this picture depicts this person&quot; more explicitly than using ambiguous tags. That would be cool for extracting social graph data based a bit more on the real world, and less on what people feel obligated to say. See old prototypes over here. http://rdfweb.org/2002/01/photo/  ... it could probably be built on top of tags (and in Flickr, machine tags). Facebook have similar construct too, and accessible to their own APIs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this is cool <img src='http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Sorry, only just noticed it.</p>
<p>And now I feel bad! I was grumbling about SmugMug (and MySpace) in my blog, &#8230; the story about private photos being brute-force discoverable&#8230; but I should&#8217;ve asked your side of the story first. So my apologies there. Maybe we just disagree about whether predictable &#8216;private&#8217; URLs are a problem; but I should&#8217;ve asked before grumbling in public.</p>
<p>Re FOAF, XFN etc., do you have any plan to allow users to tag &#8220;this picture depicts this person&#8221; more explicitly than using ambiguous tags. That would be cool for extracting social graph data based a bit more on the real world, and less on what people feel obligated to say. See old prototypes over here. <a href="http://rdfweb.org/2002/01/photo/" rel="nofollow">http://rdfweb.org/2002/01/photo/</a>  &#8230; it could probably be built on top of tags (and in Flickr, machine tags). Facebook have similar construct too, and accessible to their own APIs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmugBlog: Don MacAskill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SmugMug &#38; DataPortability.org</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/comment-page-1/#comment-101885</link>
		<dc:creator>SmugBlog: Don MacAskill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SmugMug &#38; DataPortability.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-101885</guid>
		<description>[...] already supports OpenID (and better support is coming), XFN &amp; FOAF, RSS, Atom &amp; KML, and has a rich API to both store and retrieve your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already supports OpenID (and better support is coming), XFN &#38; FOAF, RSS, Atom &#38; KML, and has a rich API to both store and retrieve your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/comment-page-1/#comment-70816</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-70816</guid>
		<description>How do I access FOAF and the XFN stuff? Is it part of the API? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I access FOAF and the XFN stuff? Is it part of the API? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Social Web Now: #2 at Like It Matters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/comment-page-1/#comment-69041</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Social Web Now: #2 at Like It Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-69041</guid>
		<description>[...] That inspired the folks at SmugMug to add XFN support for 150k accounts and counting.  Brady Forrest noticed this, and asked for more examples at the O&#8217;Reilly Radar blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That inspired the folks at SmugMug to add XFN support for 150k accounts and counting.  Brady Forrest noticed this, and asked for more examples at the O&#8217;Reilly Radar blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
