<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SmugMug supports XFN &#038; FOAF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/</link>
	<description>Thought stream from SmugMug's CEO &#38; Chief Geek</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-bleeding2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brickley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-101946</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-101946</guid>
		<description>Hey, this is cool :) Sorry, only just noticed it.

And now I feel bad! I was grumbling about SmugMug (and MySpace) in my blog, ... the story about private photos being brute-force discoverable... but I should've asked your side of the story first. So my apologies there. Maybe we just disagree about whether predictable 'private' URLs are a problem; but I should've asked before grumbling in public.

Re FOAF, XFN etc., do you have any plan to allow users to tag "this picture depicts this person" more explicitly than using ambiguous tags. That would be cool for extracting social graph data based a bit more on the real world, and less on what people feel obligated to say. See old prototypes over here. http://rdfweb.org/2002/01/photo/  ... it could probably be built on top of tags (and in Flickr, machine tags). Facebook have similar construct too, and accessible to their own APIs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this is cool <img src='http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Sorry, only just noticed it.</p>
<p>And now I feel bad! I was grumbling about SmugMug (and MySpace) in my blog, &#8230; the story about private photos being brute-force discoverable&#8230; but I should&#8217;ve asked your side of the story first. So my apologies there. Maybe we just disagree about whether predictable &#8216;private&#8217; URLs are a problem; but I should&#8217;ve asked before grumbling in public.</p>
<p>Re FOAF, XFN etc., do you have any plan to allow users to tag &#8220;this picture depicts this person&#8221; more explicitly than using ambiguous tags. That would be cool for extracting social graph data based a bit more on the real world, and less on what people feel obligated to say. See old prototypes over here. <a href="http://rdfweb.org/2002/01/photo/" rel="nofollow">http://rdfweb.org/2002/01/photo/</a>  &#8230; it could probably be built on top of tags (and in Flickr, machine tags). Facebook have similar construct too, and accessible to their own APIs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmugBlog: Don MacAskill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SmugMug &#38; DataPortability.org</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-101885</link>
		<dc:creator>SmugBlog: Don MacAskill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SmugMug &#38; DataPortability.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-101885</guid>
		<description>[...] already supports OpenID (and better support is coming), XFN &#38; FOAF, RSS, Atom &#38; KML, and has a rich API to both store and retrieve your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already supports OpenID (and better support is coming), XFN &#38; FOAF, RSS, Atom &#38; KML, and has a rich API to both store and retrieve your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-70816</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-70816</guid>
		<description>How do I access FOAF and the XFN stuff? Is it part of the API? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I access FOAF and the XFN stuff? Is it part of the API? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Social Web Now: #2 at Like It Matters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-69041</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Social Web Now: #2 at Like It Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/09/21/smugmug-supports-xfn-foaf/#comment-69041</guid>
		<description>[...] That inspired the folks at SmugMug to add XFN support for 150k accounts and counting.  Brady Forrest noticed this, and asked for more examples at the O&#8217;Reilly Radar blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That inspired the folks at SmugMug to add XFN support for 150k accounts and counting.  Brady Forrest noticed this, and asked for more examples at the O&#8217;Reilly Radar blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
