<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun acquires MySQL!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/</link>
	<description>Thought stream from SmugMug's CEO &#38; Chief Geek</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-bleeding2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ZUrlocker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/#comment-101235</link>
		<dc:creator>ZUrlocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/#comment-101235</guid>
		<description>Don,
thanks for your posting.  I've asked our director of technical support and VP of Engineering to contact you to get more information about what version you are running and what platform.  With that information we can determine if there are fixes to the threading and concurrency issues you've noted.  

We are working closely with InnoDB in these areas and have incorporated some fixes to improve autoinc performance in 5.1.22 (RC) and also adaptive cache patch in 5.0.54 (GA). InnoDB has been great to work with and the situation with them has been "business as usual".

We are also reviewing all of the Google patches, and I apologize that this has taken longer to review and test than we have expected. (Mea culpa on this.)  

We're also looking forward to working with Sun in these areas.  They have great expertise in scaling performance.  

If you can send more info through a support incident that would be helpful.  Or contact me directly via email. 
--Zack

Zack Urlocker 
ZUrlocker (at) MySQL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,<br />
thanks for your posting.  I&#8217;ve asked our director of technical support and VP of Engineering to contact you to get more information about what version you are running and what platform.  With that information we can determine if there are fixes to the threading and concurrency issues you&#8217;ve noted.  </p>
<p>We are working closely with InnoDB in these areas and have incorporated some fixes to improve autoinc performance in 5.1.22 (RC) and also adaptive cache patch in 5.0.54 (GA). InnoDB has been great to work with and the situation with them has been &#8220;business as usual&#8221;.</p>
<p>We are also reviewing all of the Google patches, and I apologize that this has taken longer to review and test than we have expected. (Mea culpa on this.)  </p>
<p>We&#8217;re also looking forward to working with Sun in these areas.  They have great expertise in scaling performance.  </p>
<p>If you can send more info through a support incident that would be helpful.  Or contact me directly via email.<br />
&#8211;Zack</p>
<p>Zack Urlocker<br />
ZUrlocker (at) MySQL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Creswell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/#comment-101172</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Creswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/#comment-101172</guid>
		<description>I have little evidence to suggest that this is a problem but I would note that InnoDB is owned by Oracle these days:

http://www.oracle.com/innodb/index.html

Perhaps this causes some conflicts/issues that slow down progress in that area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have little evidence to suggest that this is a problem but I would note that InnoDB is owned by Oracle these days:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oracle.com/innodb/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oracle.com/innodb/index.html</a></p>
<p>Perhaps this causes some conflicts/issues that slow down progress in that area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Warfield</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/#comment-100961</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Warfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/01/16/sun-acquires-mysql/#comment-100961</guid>
		<description>I think it's a brilliant game changing move by Sun, and will be generally good for all concerned.  It should both quicken the pace of innovation and solidify the quality and performance of MySQL.  There are other fascinating possibilities dimly showing in the tea leaves as well.

More on my blog:

http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/mysql-and-bea-oracle-and-sun-will-be-at-each-others-throats/

Cheers,

BW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a brilliant game changing move by Sun, and will be generally good for all concerned.  It should both quicken the pace of innovation and solidify the quality and performance of MySQL.  There are other fascinating possibilities dimly showing in the tea leaves as well.</p>
<p>More on my blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/mysql-and-bea-oracle-and-sun-will-be-at-each-others-throats/" rel="nofollow">http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/01/16/mysql-and-bea-oracle-and-sun-will-be-at-each-others-throats/</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>BW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
