<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>smugblog: Getting Great Prints &#187; i2e</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/great-prints/category/i2e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/great-prints</link>
	<description>There is no such thing as a great print straight from the camera.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The sweetness that is i2e</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/great-prints/2005/06/24/the-sweetness-that-is-i2e/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.smugmug.com/great-prints/2005/06/24/the-sweetness-that-is-i2e/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Color correction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i2e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.net/great-prints/?p=2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you think industrial-strength color correction, you think&#8230;Photoshop.
Trouble is:  time.  It takes for-EVAH to get decent color correction with Photoshop.  That&#8217;s okay for landscape photographers, but what event photographers have the time to Photoshop 500 photos?
And face it:  Photoshop&#8217;s autocolor is a joke.
Enter i2e, the program I use for 90%  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you think industrial-strength color correction, you think&#8230;Photoshop.</p>
<p>Trouble is:  time.  It takes <em><strong>for-EVAH</strong></em> to get <a href="http://www.smugmug.com/help/skin-tone">decent color correction</a> with Photoshop.  That&#8217;s okay for landscape photographers, but what event photographers have the time to Photoshop 500 photos?</p>
<p>And face it:  Photoshop&#8217;s autocolor is a joke.</p>
<p>Enter i2e, the program I use for 90%  of my color correction.  When you order a print from smugmug and choose autocolor, it&#8217;s going through i2e.  And 90% of the time, its autocorrect is better than most people can do manually in Photoshop.</p>
<p>I use the image editor standard edition ($325) from <a href="http://www.colour-science.com">Colour-Science</a> in Switzerland.  I don&#8217;t need the color management stuff in the pro edition.  They have a home edition for $64 &#8212; good if you don&#8217;t process too many images.</p>
<p>What makes the program so sweet?</p>
<p>1.  Rare is the image that fully automatic i2e corrections don&#8217;t improve.  Photoshop&#8217;s autocorrect screws up 50% of images.</p>
<p>2.  It does a great job of sensing memory color areas of the photo &#8212; sky, grass, and skin &#8212; and moving them toward believable values.</p>
<p>3.  Manually tweaking is incredibly easy and fast compared to Photoshop curves.  You can process hundreds of photos an hour.</p>
<p>What you still need Photoshop for:  creative things like the  bandaid tool to fix blemishes.</p>
<p>What I wish it had:  a hover tool + info pallette like Photoshop has so you can see color values at any spot on the photo.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve got a month&#8217;s free trial.  You gotta try it.</p>
<p>Disclaimer: I&#8217;ve never even met them and don&#8217;t get anything for saying nice things about the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.smugmug.com/great-prints/2005/06/24/the-sweetness-that-is-i2e/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
