<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prophoto RGB &#8211; it&#8217;s great but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/2005/12/15/prophoto-rgb-its-great-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/2005/12/15/prophoto-rgb-its-great-but/</link>
	<description>Got sales?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:44:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: smugblog: Pro Corner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Now Convert Adobe RGB and Prophoto RGB on Upload</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/2005/12/15/prophoto-rgb-its-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>smugblog: Pro Corner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Now Convert Adobe RGB and Prophoto RGB on Upload</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/?p=14#comment-632</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve written about Prophoto RGB and sRGB vs aRGB on many occasions. This is not a debate about one color space or another - but for display on SmugMug and printing at ourlab, your photos must be in sRGB color space. For most of you, this is not an issue, you are aware and either you shoot and process in sRGB or your final step is a conversion to sRGB. Cool. But for some folks, unaware, they&#8217;d upload Adobe RGB or Prophoto RGB files and the prints would be the YUCK!. No worries, though, becuase The SmugMug Guarantee covers you and your customer for reprints. And convert color space, color correct, and reprint I did [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve written about Prophoto RGB and sRGB vs aRGB on many occasions. This is not a debate about one color space or another &#8211; but for display on SmugMug and printing at ourlab, your photos must be in sRGB color space. For most of you, this is not an issue, you are aware and either you shoot and process in sRGB or your final step is a conversion to sRGB. Cool. But for some folks, unaware, they&#8217;d upload Adobe RGB or Prophoto RGB files and the prints would be the YUCK!. No worries, though, becuase The SmugMug Guarantee covers you and your customer for reprints. And convert color space, color correct, and reprint I did [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/2005/12/15/prophoto-rgb-its-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/?p=14#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Andy - It seems perfectly reasonable to me: bottom line is that you will *not* get the prints you want if you accidentally upload something in anything other than sRGB.  It makes perfect sense that images tagged with a non-sRGB colorspace be converted using something on the backend - may even save you some support calls about &quot;bad color prints&quot;.

If you simply skip the conversion on sRGB tagged and un-tagged images (which implies sRGB, IIRC), users wouldn&#039;t be &quot;forced&quot; to go through the conversion if they for some reason would prefer to handle it themselves (in PS, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; It seems perfectly reasonable to me: bottom line is that you will *not* get the prints you want if you accidentally upload something in anything other than sRGB.  It makes perfect sense that images tagged with a non-sRGB colorspace be converted using something on the backend &#8211; may even save you some support calls about &#8220;bad color prints&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you simply skip the conversion on sRGB tagged and un-tagged images (which implies sRGB, IIRC), users wouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;forced&#8221; to go through the conversion if they for some reason would prefer to handle it themselves (in PS, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/2005/12/15/prophoto-rgb-its-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/?p=14#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I wonder how folks would feel if we converted to sRGB for them, on upload - not just the -S, M and L files but the -O file, the original.  

I&#039;m all ears here!

-- Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how folks would feel if we converted to sRGB for them, on upload &#8211; not just the -S, M and L files but the -O file, the original.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all ears here!</p>
<p>&#8211; Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/2005/12/15/prophoto-rgb-its-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/?p=14#comment-40</guid>
		<description>The most recent Photoshop User magazine had an article about automatic scripting in photoshop.  I wonder if anyone could create an easy script that would convert an image from Prophoto to sRGB before the file is saved?  If not it&#039;d be easy to set up an action associated with an f key that would automatically convert the colorspace and bit-depth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most recent Photoshop User magazine had an article about automatic scripting in photoshop.  I wonder if anyone could create an easy script that would convert an image from Prophoto to sRGB before the file is saved?  If not it&#8217;d be easy to set up an action associated with an f key that would automatically convert the colorspace and bit-depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/2005/12/15/prophoto-rgb-its-great-but/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smugmug.com/pros/?p=14#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Is there a reason why the upload tools/backend processing can&#039;t recognize images which are tagged with a different colorspace and convert automatically?  

I&#039;ve read the FAQs on &quot;why you only need sRGB&quot; on the SM site, and I agree that there&#039;s no point in going higher if EZ Prints doesn&#039;t support it.  Still, it&#039;d be more convenient if we could work in aRGB, or even ppRGB and not have to worry about accidentally forgetting to convert when we upload.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a reason why the upload tools/backend processing can&#8217;t recognize images which are tagged with a different colorspace and convert automatically?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read the FAQs on &#8220;why you only need sRGB&#8221; on the SM site, and I agree that there&#8217;s no point in going higher if EZ Prints doesn&#8217;t support it.  Still, it&#8217;d be more convenient if we could work in aRGB, or even ppRGB and not have to worry about accidentally forgetting to convert when we upload.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
